Week 3 Assignment, Part 3
Draft Action
Research Project Progress Report
Action
Research Report Components
Directions:
·
Using the following eight outline elements, write your
paper at the end of this assignment document in the space entitled Draft Action
Research Project Report.
a.
Action research Plan and Title – To improve the 3rd grade academic
student performance for the STAAR reading test through the Utilization of the
best language (Spanish or English) and facilitation of the best practices and
foundational bilingual support for students. Selection of the language in which
the 3rd grade bilingual students will take the STAAR reading 3rd
grade test based on a study of action research. (5 points)
1.
Needs Assessment – Does
the explicit teaching of the TEKS standards enhance English Language learner’s
performance on the STAAR reading test and which language should they test to
make certain they are successful? Curriculum standards were designed to
ensure every student gained the same education as his or her peers. However,
these curricula did not account for the English versus Spanish variations and
the types of learners each classroom possesses. Every student does not learn
the same way. Now that this has been established, a sampling of 42 third grade
students were selected to test a theory of early exit versus maintaining
students in the bilingual program for the recommended 6 years based on research
and the new district recommendation. By varying the techniques of instruction
through the use of English or Spanish, the teacher can ensure each student’s
needs are met and provide them with every opportunity to succeed in the
language that the student is more comfortable when taking the 3rd
grade reading STAAR test.
2.
Objectives and Vision of the action research project.
(ELCC 1.1) –Since every student does not respond to the same method
or language of instruction, it is the teacher’s responsibility to find various
avenues to reach each and every student. According to Tracey Hall, senior
research scientist for the National Center on Accessing the General Curriculum,
“To differentiate instruction is to recognize students varying background
knowledge, readiness, language, preferences in learning, interests, and to
react responsively” (Hall, 2002). Differentiated instruction is a method of
changing teaching and learning for students with different language abilities
within the same classroom environment.
The use of English and Spanish falls into the category of
differentiating instruction. Utilizing the language that the student is
more comfortable with also augments the relationship between teacher and
student. If the correct selection of language is identified and used
effectively; and teachers take on the role of mentor rather than teacher. Also,
using the right language when mastering reading helps make the student's
learning experience more meaningful and fun.
3.
Review of the Literature and Action Research Strategy –
A few References to theories that guide my action research :
Cohen, E. G., R. Lotan and L. Catanzarite. "Can expectations for competence be altered in the classroom." In M. Webster, Jr. and M. Foschi (Eds.), Status generalization: New theory and research , 2001
This paper looks at nine bilingual elementary school classes in the San Jose area to determine how student language misconceptions affect the classroom. The children in the classrooms work together at learning centers and solve problems involving math and science concepts. The authors examine the data obtained from these classrooms to see whether the effects of student characteristics, such as having a first language other than English, can be altered.
Figueroa, R. A. and E. Garcia. "Issues in Testing Students from Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Backgrounds." In Multicultural Education , Fall 1994.University Press, 1988, pp. 27-54)
Figueroa and Garcia approach the task of educating limited English proficiency students from an assessment standpoint. They believe that these students often do not develop either their first or second language to its fullest potential because of an emphasis on learning English quickly rather than developing skills and engaging in content-area learning.
Ellis, N. E. "Collaborative Interaction for the Improvement of Teaching." Teaching and Teacher Education , 6:3, pp. 267-77, 1990.
This reference looks at the effects of the implementation of collaborative interactions among elementary school teachers within an instructional science program for bilingual classrooms, and suggests that frequency and structured quality of collaborative meetings among teachers affected the quality of the implementation of the program.
Cohen, E. G., R. Lotan and L. Catanzarite. "Can expectations for competence be altered in the classroom." In M. Webster, Jr. and M. Foschi (Eds.), Status generalization: New theory and research , 2001
This paper looks at nine bilingual elementary school classes in the San Jose area to determine how student language misconceptions affect the classroom. The children in the classrooms work together at learning centers and solve problems involving math and science concepts. The authors examine the data obtained from these classrooms to see whether the effects of student characteristics, such as having a first language other than English, can be altered.
Figueroa, R. A. and E. Garcia. "Issues in Testing Students from Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Backgrounds." In Multicultural Education , Fall 1994.University Press, 1988, pp. 27-54)
Figueroa and Garcia approach the task of educating limited English proficiency students from an assessment standpoint. They believe that these students often do not develop either their first or second language to its fullest potential because of an emphasis on learning English quickly rather than developing skills and engaging in content-area learning.
Ellis, N. E. "Collaborative Interaction for the Improvement of Teaching." Teaching and Teacher Education , 6:3, pp. 267-77, 1990.
This reference looks at the effects of the implementation of collaborative interactions among elementary school teachers within an instructional science program for bilingual classrooms, and suggests that frequency and structured quality of collaborative meetings among teachers affected the quality of the implementation of the program.
4.
Articulate the Vision (ELCC 1.2) – A group
of all the 3rd grade bilingual teachers addressed the need to
differentiate instruction further to help English language learners build
skills and confidence when while reading in both languages. My research has been shared to a diverse
group of people consisting students, teachers, specialist, parents and other
administrators. Deer Park ISD has used oral presentations in the form of PLC
meetings and staff development training to explain to the Deer Park Elementary
school staff the purpose for the action research. We have sent data information
to parents and other schools regarding the need for improvement in this area.
Any data presented has been evaluated. This would give me an opportunity the
change any growing concern for student performance in our school. I have used
blogs, teacher grade level communication and emails to gain valuable feedback.
5.
Manage the
organization (ELCC 3.1) – We spoke with the principal and the campus
curriculum coordinator about our idea for action research. They were both supportive and were looking
forward to the results. The students were given a very brief overview of the
project. Parents were notified with a letter regarding the project and were
invited to contact us if they had any questions. A copy of the action plan was
submitted to the Bilingual director for comments and concerns.
As a part of the focus of study, the collaborating teachers
gathered a group of 22 third grade bilingual students who were either Spanish
dominant or English dominant readers. Our school has collaborated using team
grade level chairs and reading specialists to review job descriptions and
evaluation strategies using current reading standards. (For example , current
reading STAAR standards will be used as a guide to indicate students needs
according to objectives they scored poorly on TAKS). Following the meeting with
the committee or team I will meet with each member to discuss their major
duties, concerns, and recommendations for improvement.
6.
Manage Operations (ELCC 3.2) – The
student's progress through this study was based on various criteria. During the process of the action research
plan development I was in charge of routinely meeting with the staff
responsible for the implementation of the action research project; the teachers
were required to record the data. Using this data, I planned with the reading
specialist to develop a professional development training including current
evaluations and future needs. Other data includes three district assessments
one for the beginning, middle, and ending of the school year. STAAR assessment
data was evaluated for only one year because it is a recent test; while the
TAKS assessment data was evaluated for the previous three years. The team
involved did build a concern about the lack of Reading LAB time for the 3rd
grade teachers which was later resolved by having classroom teachers plan with
the reading/technology lab specialist every week in order to be able to
continue having Reading Lab exercises done in the classroom. Another method of
determining the student's success was the use of I-Stations in Spanish or
English. Each month, the student would
be tested to determine his or her overall growth in text fluency, letter
knowledge, phonemic awareness, alphabetic decoding, comprehension, vocabulary,
and spelling. Another method of
assessment was the students overall achievement on weekly reading activities
and assessments.
7. Respond
to Community Interest and Needs (ELCC 4.2) – The action research project
will serve the needs of the 3rd grade bilingual students and
students with diverse backgrounds (cultural, ethnic, economic, or special
interest groups) by helping the student build confidence in his or her reading
skills in the language that he or she is more comfortable and successful. The ELL
students will benefit from this action research. The teachers will benefit by
figuring out what teaching techniques or how information must be presented in
order to improve passing rate on the reading STAAR test by the ELL student
population. The school as a whole will benefit, the students individually, the
teacher morale, the school district and the community.
No comments:
Post a Comment